← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Hemmer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-08-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 St. Cloud Cathedral USHS-MN 21 0 1 1 0.048 0.0059 0.0059 0.0116 0.0116
2020-21 St. Cloud Cathedral USHS-MN 18 5 7 12 0.667 0.0821 0.0821 0.1619 0.1619
2021-22 St. Cloud Cathedral USHS-MN 26 4 9 13 0.500 0.0616 0.0616 0.1215 0.1215
2022-23 St. Cloud Cathedral USHS-MN 8 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 NA3HL 35 6 10 16 0.457 0.0506 0.0504 0.1448 0.1444
2024-25 NCDC 43 6 15 21 0.488 0.1129 0.1084
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 22 1 4 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2025-26 · Stevenson
+182.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7406
Defenseman overall
#1780
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2003-04
0.526 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.