IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Keanan Pearman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-11-29 Country: Canada
Gustavus Adolphus
MIAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 WB/Scranton Knights NCDC 54 8 19 27 0.500 0.2039 0.2091 0.4019 0.4121
2025-26 Minnesota Mallards NAHL 59 11 15 26 0.441 0.1619 0.1576 0.4652 0.4528
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23951
Forward overall
#1352
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Gustavus Adolphus Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Emil Samuelsson
0.68
actual FR PPG at Gustavus Adolphus
Ross Ring-Jarvi
1.03
actual FR PPG at Gustavus Adolphus
Wyatt Nielsen
0.00
actual FR PPG at Gustavus Adolphus
Shael Hechter
0.50
actual FR PPG at Gustavus Adolphus

D2/3 Comparables

Todd Jackson
Norwich · 2015-16
0.379 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Roach
SUNY Brockport · 2022-23
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnny Meo
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.