← New Search ↗ Social Card

Koen Harrold Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2008-11-29 Country: Canada
Alaska Fairbanks
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 49 2 15 17 0.347 0.1275 0.1432 0.3666 0.4118
2026-27 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1225 0.1336 0.3523 0.3842
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12114
Defenseman overall
#766
Defenseman born in 2008
#4147
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Cornell (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

Alaska Fairbanks Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2019-20
0.11
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.17
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.06
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Alaska Fairbanks

D2/3 Comparables

Stevenson · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2012-13
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2012-13
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.