IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

A.J Iwinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-18 Country: USA
Southern Maine
Verbal LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 — NCDC 46 14 9 23 0.500 0.2039 0.2079 0.4001 0.4079
2025-26 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 56 5 9 14 0.250 0.0919 0.0889 0.2642 0.2556
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31406
Forward overall
#1850
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Southern Maine Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Isaac Grondin
0.33
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine
Tyler Gardiner
0.42
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine
Dalton Roberto
0.00
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine
Adam Papayoanou
0.19
actual FR PPG at Southern Maine

D2/3 Comparables

Justin Charbonneau
Norwich · 2013-14
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Ethan Pitzman
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Levi Wunder
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.