← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Devlin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 St. Sebastian’s NE-Prep 25 6 10 16 0.640 0.1287 0.1287 0.2927 0.2927
2019-20 Chicago Steel USHL 36 6 2 8 0.222 0.1311 0.1311 0.6668 0.6668
2020-21 — USHL 48 12 9 21 0.438 0.2581 0.2581 1.3128 1.3128
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SR 35 9 14 23 0.657
2023-24 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast JR 28 13 7 20 0.714
2022-23 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast SO 35 12 12 24 0.686
2021-22 New Hampshire D1 HockeyEast FR 34 9 7 16 0.471
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.47
2021-22 · New Hampshire
+327.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
88%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27643
Forward overall
#1444
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2017-18
0.931 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.