IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Penoyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-01-23 Country: USA
SUNY Geneseo
UCHC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2025-26 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 10 1 2 3 0.300 0.1102 0.1136 0.3171 0.3268
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14374
Defenseman overall
#1900
Defenseman born in 2007
#4722
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Wingels
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

SUNY Geneseo Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Andrew Rygiel
0.36
actual FR PPG at SUNY Geneseo
Zach Rehbaum
0.35
actual FR PPG at SUNY Geneseo
Joe Serpico
0.57
actual FR PPG at SUNY Geneseo
Stefan Miklakos
0.31
actual FR PPG at SUNY Geneseo

D2/3 Comparables

Charlie Ross
Nazareth · 2021-22
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Gresh
Hobart · 2016-17
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Gonrowski
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.