← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Bazner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-05-02 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Niagara Falls Canucks OJHL 50 5 23 28 0.560 0.1373 0.1391 0.3856 0.3907
2025-26 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 13 0 3 3 0.231 0.0848 0.0843 0.2436 0.2422
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 3 0 2 2 0.667
2024-25 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 3 0 2 2 0.667
2023-24 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 3 0 2 2 0.667
2022-23 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 3 0 2 2 0.667
2021-22 University of Kentucky ACHA_D1 3 0 2 2 0.667

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13718
Defenseman overall
#2535
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2017-18
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2013-14
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.