← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaden Grant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 26 2 3 5 0.192 0.1134 0.1134 0.5770 0.5770
2020-21 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 40 9 11 20 0.500 0.2949 0.2949 1.5004 1.5004
2021-22 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 59 17 21 38 0.644 0.3800 0.3682 1.9328 1.8729
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SR 35 8 4 12 0.343
2024-25 Bowling Green D1 CCHA JR 34 5 8 13 0.382
2023-24 Bowling Green D1 CCHA SO 36 3 11 14 0.389
2022-23 Bowling Green D1 CCHA FR 36 3 5 8 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2022-23 · Bowling Green
-29.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

75%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15952
Forward overall
#845
Forward born in 2002
#1698
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hamilton · 2000-01
1.400 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2000-01
1.226 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2015-16
1.423 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.