← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Weis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-02-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Madison Capitols USHL 38 2 2 4 0.105 0.0621 0.0621 0.3163 0.3163
2020-21 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 52 20 25 45 0.865 0.3179 0.3179 1.8657 1.8657
2021-22 Fargo Force USHL 62 5 15 20 0.323 0.1903 0.1790 0.9689 0.9116
2022-23 Madison Capitols USHL 9 2 2 4 0.444 0.2622 0.2331 1.3347 1.1863
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio State D1 BigTen GR 34 1 4 5 0.147
2024-25 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 35 2 5 7 0.200
2023-24 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 37 4 7 11 0.297
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2023-24 · Ohio State
+64.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26066
Forward overall
#1467
Forward born in 2002
#2517
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.030 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2011-12
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.