IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.3718 0.4216 0.5391 0.6113
2018-19 Northeast Generals NAHL 24 5 4 9 0.375 0.1486 0.1609 0.3937 0.4262
2019-20 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 22 1 3 4 0.182 0.1118 0.1118 0.5356 0.5356
2020-21 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 12 1 1 2 0.167 0.0660 0.0660 0.1750 0.1750
2021-22 Boston Advantage NCDC 28 12 12 24 0.857 0.4779 0.4450 0.6931 0.6454
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Army D1 AHA SR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Army D1 AHA JR 7 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Army D1 AHA SO 12 1 1 2 0.167
2022-23 Army D1 AHA FR 27 1 2 3 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.28
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2022-23 · Army
-60.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11512
Forward overall
#504
Forward born in 2001
#287
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Mingoia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Union (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mark Menzies
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Ganz
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2024-25
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Froese
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.