IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Boudreau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-11-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 42 3 9 12 0.286 0.1165 0.1247 0.2296 0.2458
2018-19 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 29 3 9 12 0.414 0.1687 0.1710 0.3326 0.3371
2019-20 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 29 2 1 3 0.103 0.0610 0.0610 0.3106 0.3106
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 20 0 4 4 0.200
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 21 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10904
Defenseman overall
#2034
Defenseman born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bart Moran
Castleton · 2011-12
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Hansen
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Dougherty
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.