← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Kletti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-01-08 Country: USA
2026 NHL Draft Eligible
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Mahtomedi USHS-MN 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Chisago Lakes USHS-MN 28 17 26 43 1.536 0.4134 0.4134 0.3730 0.3730
2025-26 Chisago Lakes USHS-MN 28 28 35 63 2.250 0.6057 0.6057
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2306
Forward overall
#27
Forward born in 2008

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.52 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.09 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.72 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.07 PPG
→ Michigan (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.69 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Castleton · 2007-08
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2005-06
1.462 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2022-23
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.