IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aidan Souligny Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-01-02 Country: Canada
Boston University
HockeyEast D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Navan Grads CCHL 12 0 2 2 0.167 0.0362 0.0401 0.1290 0.1430
2023-24 — BCHL 42 0 5 5 0.119 0.0459 0.0487 0.1732 0.1836
2024-25 — BCHL 50 2 16 18 0.360 0.1387 0.1401 0.5239 0.5291
2025-26 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 18 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25621
Defenseman overall
#3923
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vince Pedrie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Penn State (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG

Boston University Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Hugo Blixt
SHL 2025-26
0.05
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Braden Doyle
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.12
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Kyle Kim
NAHL 2023-24
0.00
actual FR PPG at Boston University
Lachlan Getz
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.00
actual FR PPG at Boston University

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Whitelaw
Salem State · 2024-25
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Franco Loparco
Concordia · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ian Williams
Norwich · 2013-14
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.