← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Whitelaw Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-01-25 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 7 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 18 6 7 13 0.722 0.1206 0.1214 0.3007 0.3026
2025-26 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC FR 15 6 5 11 0.733
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2025-26 · Salem State
+572.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17384
Forward overall
#721
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Johnson & Wales · 2021-22
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.