IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Gravel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Walpole Express EHLP 41 21 31 52 1.268 0.1455 0.1447 0.2859 0.2843
2022-23 Express Hockey Club EHL 38 9 4 13 0.342 0.0790 0.0792 0.1674 0.1678
2023-24 Express Hockey Club EHL 45 6 11 17 0.378 0.0873 0.0831 0.1849 0.1760
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE SO 21 0 3 3 0.143
2024-25 Johnson & Wales D3 CNE — 21 2 3 5 0.238
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2024-25 · Johnson & Wales
+241.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36371
Forward overall
#2249
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joey McGrath
Buffalo State · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hogan Davidson
Nichols · 2015-16
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse McConney
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.158 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.