IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jesse McConney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-02-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Collingwood Blues OJHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2006-07 Huntsville Otters OJHL 48 4 35 39 0.812 0.1991 0.1976 0.5562 0.5521
2007-08 Huntsville Otters OJHL 43 5 21 26 0.605 0.1482 0.1404 0.4139 0.3921
2008-09 Huntsville Otters OJHL 47 13 39 52 1.106 0.2712 0.2430 0.7573 0.6786
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 30 4 23 27 0.900
2011-12 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 30 6 15 21 0.700
2010-11 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 13 0 2 2 0.154
2009-10 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 19 0 3 3 0.158
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2009-10 · SUNY Oswego
-17.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3912
Defenseman overall
#699
Defenseman born in 1988
#753
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Logan Kelly
Canton · 2023-24
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Calder
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alain Joanette
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.