IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Fodstad Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Minnesota Mullets USPHL-Premier 36 7 5 12 0.333 0.0436 0.0468 0.1131 0.1214
2018-19 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 41 20 11 31 0.756 0.0949 0.0963 0.2387 0.2422
2019-20 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 43 28 26 54 1.256 0.1576 0.1576 — —
2020-21 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 38 16 19 35 0.921 0.1156 0.1156 0.2908 0.2908
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Concordia D3 MIAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
95%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24353
Forward overall
#1151
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Kudynski
Lebanon Valley · 2002-03
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Callum Hofford
Salem State · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Troy Boisjoli
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.