IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Ouellette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1982-07-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Merritt Centennials BCHL 58 34 29 63 1.086 0.4185 0.4282 1.5807 1.6175
2001-02 Merritt Centennials BCHL 49 32 41 73 1.490 0.5740 0.5557 2.1681 2.0990
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SR 33 13 24 37 1.121
2004-05 Dartmouth D1 ECAC JR 35 15 26 41 1.171
2003-04 Dartmouth D1 ECAC SO 34 16 9 25 0.735
2002-03 Dartmouth D1 ECAC FR 34 14 21 35 1.029
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.47
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.03
2002-03 · Dartmouth
+119.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5955
Forward overall
#210
Forward born in 1982
#57
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

J.T. Stenglein
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Michigan (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sam Anas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.98 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Luc Gerdes
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Riley Bourbonnais
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Biggs
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Christopher Miraldo
Westfield State · 2021-22
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Cusin
UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.