IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Jeffers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-05-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Omaha Lancers USHL 7 1 0 1 0.143 0.0843 0.0843 0.4210 0.4210
2020-21 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 16 0 5 5 0.312 0.1110 0.1110 0.3281 0.3281
2021-22 — NAHL 24 0 5 5 0.208 0.0740 0.0772 0.2187 0.2281
2022-23 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 44 2 7 9 0.204 0.0473 0.0472 — —
2023-24 — NAHL 39 5 5 10 0.256 0.0911 0.0862 0.2692 0.2547
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA SO 24 4 10 14 0.583
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA — 14 2 4 6 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2024-25 · Trine
+543.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16772
Defenseman overall
#3039
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jared Hummel
Hamline · 2006-07
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Nikita Sobolev
New England College · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Brow
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.