IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jared Hummel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-05-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 45 2 6 8 0.178 0.1049 0.1006 0.5238 0.5023
2006-07 — USHL 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.1311 0.1190 0.6546 0.5942
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Hamline D3 — JR 18 2 12 14 0.778
2008-09 Hamline D3 — SO 27 6 14 20 0.741
2007-08 Hamline D3 — FR 27 4 27 31 1.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.15
2007-08 · Hamline
+989.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15565
Defenseman overall
#1432
Defenseman born in 1986
#3740
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Spencer Korona
Trinity · 2021-22
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Roepke
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2022-23
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Way
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.