IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steve Kordyban Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-07-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 30 6 9 15 0.500 0.1926 0.2066 0.7286 0.7815
2001-02 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 55 20 33 53 0.964 0.3713 0.3778 1.4041 1.4285
2002-03 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 43 16 29 45 1.046 0.4032 0.3928 1.5249 1.4854
2003-04 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 46 14 30 44 0.957 0.3685 0.3426 1.3937 1.2957
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 11 4 4 8 0.727
2004-05 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 10 1 0 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2004-05 · Wisconsin-Superior
-67.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10551
Forward overall
#381
Forward born in 1983
#333
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John Williams
Curry · 2007-08
1.222 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bates Ling
New England College · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Nowakowski
St. Scholastica · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.