← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Montes Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 44 9 6 15 0.341 0.2011 0.2011 1.0239 1.0239
2021-22 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 60 14 18 32 0.533 0.3146 0.3205 1.6017 1.6318
2022-23 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 59 23 21 44 0.746 0.4399 0.4253 2.2399 2.1656
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 37 15 13 28 0.757
2024-25 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 40 14 12 26 0.650
2023-24 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 37 9 9 18 0.486
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.49
2023-24 · Ohio State
+48.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

90%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11466
Forward overall
#512
Forward born in 2003
#1037
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2021-22
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.