← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelly Reynolds Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-02-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 29 4 7 11 0.379 0.1476 0.1548 0.5531 0.5802
2002-03 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 48 4 11 15 0.312 0.1216 0.1223 0.4557 0.4583
2003-04 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 57 9 20 29 0.509 0.1980 0.1903 0.7420 0.7133
2004-05 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 59 4 26 30 0.508 0.1979 0.1810 0.7415 0.6782
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Scholastica D3 SR 29 0 2 2 0.069
2007-08 St. Scholastica D3 JR 28 1 6 7 0.250
2006-07 St. Scholastica D3 SO 29 3 12 15 0.517
2005-06 St. Scholastica D3 FR 27 2 13 15 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2005-06 · St. Scholastica
+218.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5093
Defenseman overall
#781
Defenseman born in 1984
#2050
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Canton · 2023-24
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2021-22
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2007-08
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.