← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Simpson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-02-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 6 2 1 3 0.500 0.1926 0.2113 0.7277 0.7983
2002-03 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 59 13 29 42 0.712 0.2743 0.2891 1.0360 1.0918
2003-04 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 59 9 9 18 0.305 0.1176 0.1187 0.4440 0.4482
2004-05 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 59 10 13 23 0.390 0.1502 0.1446 0.5673 0.5461
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

NCAAe Rankings

#34662
Forward overall
#1081
Forward born in 1985
#1948
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.