| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-02 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.500 | 0.1926 | 0.2113 | 0.7277 | 0.7983 |
| 2002-03 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 59 | 13 | 29 | 42 | 0.712 | 0.2743 | 0.2891 | 1.0360 | 1.0918 |
| 2003-04 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 59 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 0.305 | 0.1176 | 0.1187 | 0.4440 | 0.4482 |
| 2004-05 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 59 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 0.390 | 0.1502 | 0.1446 | 0.5673 | 0.5461 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.