← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Cliche Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-06-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0737 0.0737 0.3754 0.3754
2021-22 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 20 0 2 2 0.100 0.0590 0.0594 0.3003 0.3025
2022-23 Vernon Vipers BCHL 39 1 11 12 0.308 0.1186 0.1159 0.4478 0.4378
2023-24 Vernon Vipers BCHL 50 10 25 35 0.700 0.2697 0.2513 1.0187 0.9492
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SO 33 0 1 1 0.030
2024-25 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA 34 4 5 9 0.265
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2024-25 · Northern Michigan
+42.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
22%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9067
Defenseman overall
#2045
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2008-09
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2002-03
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.