IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Travis Martell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-08-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2002-03 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 36 4 4 8 0.222 0.0569 0.0567 0.1647 0.1642
2003-04 Notre Dame Hounds SJHL 34 0 8 8 0.235 0.0603 0.0572 0.1744 0.1655
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Castleton D3 — SR 26 4 12 16 0.615
2006-07 Castleton D3 — JR 27 7 20 27 1.000
2005-06 Castleton D3 — SO 23 5 11 16 0.696
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2005-06 · Castleton
+1193.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22133
Defenseman overall
#1377
Defenseman born in 1983

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Williams
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emerson Mish
SUNY Cortland · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Skinner
Southern Maine · 2005-06
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.