IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Crowder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-10-16 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 Powell River Kings BCHL 52 6 6 12 0.231 0.0860 0.0979 0.3363 0.3830
2003-04 Powell River Kings BCHL 57 21 34 55 0.965 0.3594 0.3933 1.4060 1.5387
2004-05 — BCHL 56 23 27 50 0.893 0.3326 0.3485 1.3010 1.3631
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 24 4 9 13 0.542
2007-08 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 42 15 23 38 0.905
2006-07 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 41 14 11 25 0.610
2005-06 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 44 17 13 30 0.682
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.31
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2005-06 · Michigan State
+117.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17137
Forward overall
#581
Forward born in 1986
#823
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mickey Gilchrist
Middlebury · 2002-03
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Robbie Murden
Hamilton · 2010-11
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Joshua Burke
Amherst · 2018-19
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.