IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brad Herman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-12-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 60 8 13 21 0.350 0.1349 0.1485 0.5086 0.5598
2004-05 — BCHL 46 2 10 12 0.261 0.1005 0.1059 0.3791 0.3996
2005-06 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 54 10 9 19 0.352 0.1356 0.1361 0.5113 0.5134
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 14 1 4 5 0.357
2007-08 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 27 4 3 7 0.259
2006-07 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 14 0 5 5 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2006-07 · St. Norbert
+236.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#42596
Forward overall
#1366
Forward born in 1986
#2414
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Grebosky
Concordia · 2012-13
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyler Moje
Bethel · 2006-07
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Burke
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.