IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeff Hajner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1985-07-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 47 16 17 33 0.702 0.1799 0.1875 0.5292 0.5517
2004-05 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 53 15 30 45 0.849 0.2175 0.2161 0.6401 0.6359
2005-06 Melfort Mustangs SJHL 54 36 42 78 1.444 0.3701 0.3503 1.0888 1.0305
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Air Force D1 AHA SR 31 6 11 17 0.548
2008-09 Air Force D1 AHA JR 41 10 19 29 0.707
2007-08 Air Force D1 AHA SO 39 15 23 38 0.974
2006-07 Air Force D1 AHA FR 40 13 14 27 0.675
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2006-07 · Air Force
+165.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16969
Forward overall
#544
Forward born in 1985
#158
in SJHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Wahlin
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Michael Huntebrinker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.91 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Cousineau
Adrian · 2009-10
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Hodgson
Amherst · 2013-14
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Morgan
University of New England · 2017-18
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.