| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Melfort Mustangs | SJHL | 47 | 16 | 17 | 33 | 0.702 | 0.2139 | 0.2230 | 0.5203 | 0.5424 |
| 2004-05 | Melfort Mustangs | SJHL | 53 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 0.849 | 0.2586 | 0.2569 | 0.6293 | 0.6252 |
| 2005-06 | Melfort Mustangs | SJHL | 54 | 36 | 42 | 78 | 1.444 | 0.4400 | 0.4164 | 1.0704 | 1.0130 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | SR | 31 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 0.548 |
| 2008-09 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | JR | 41 | 10 | 19 | 29 | 0.707 |
| 2007-08 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | SO | 39 | 15 | 23 | 38 | 0.974 |
| 2006-07 | Air Force | D1 | AHA | FR | 40 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 0.675 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.