icepath.io · Hockey Analytics

← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan MacIntyre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1986-02-01 Country: Canada

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2002-03	Sherwood Park Crusaders	AJHL	1	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2004-05	Alberni Valley Bulldogs	BCHL	50	11	13	24	0.480	0.1849	0.1872	0.6985	0.7072
2005-06	—	BCHL	56	12	33	45	0.804	0.3096	0.2980	1.1695	1.1256
2006-07	Victoria Grizzlies	BCHL	55	11	21	32	0.582	0.2242	0.2037	0.8467	0.7694

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2007-08	Wisconsin-River Falls	D3	BigTen	FR	13	0	0	0	0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#23441

Forward overall

#796

Forward born in 1986

D1 Comparables

Will Suter

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG

→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)

0.25 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Yasin Cissé

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG

→ Boston University

0.23 No data

NCAAe PPG

Ali Thomas

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG

→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)

0.18 Developing

NCAAe PPG

David Goodwin

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG

→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)

0.35 Average

NCAAe PPG

Jordan Nelson

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG

→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)

0.31 Developing

NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Rooney

Roger Williams · 2024-25

0.667 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Chase Nieuwendyk

SUNY Brockport · 2011-12

0.667 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

Robert Clerc

SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18

0.625 Average

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.