| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Alberni Valley Bulldogs | BCHL | 50 | 11 | 13 | 24 | 0.480 | 0.1868 | 0.1891 | 0.7000 | 0.7088 |
| 2005-06 | — | BCHL | 56 | 12 | 33 | 45 | 0.804 | 0.3128 | 0.3010 | 1.1719 | 1.1279 |
| 2006-07 | Victoria Grizzlies | BCHL | 55 | 11 | 21 | 32 | 0.582 | 0.2264 | 0.2057 | 0.8484 | 0.7710 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | — | FR | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.