icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-05 | Alberni Valley Bulldogs | BCHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2005-06 | Powell River Kings | BCHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2006-07 | Williams Lake TimberWolves | BCHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2008-09 | — | MJHL | 32 | 3 | 11 | 14 | 0.438 | 0.1238 | 0.1139 | 0.2757 | 0.2537 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11 | Northland | D3 | — | SO | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2009-10 | Northland | D3 | — | FR | 7 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.714 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.