IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steven Phillips Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Neepawa Titans MJHL 42 9 2 11 0.262 0.0741 0.0722 0.1650 0.1607
2014-15 Neepawa Titans MJHL 58 22 16 38 0.655 0.1854 0.1710 0.4128 0.3806
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 7 11 18 0.581
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 32 9 12 21 0.656
2016-17 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 29 9 10 19 0.655
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 31 7 5 12 0.387
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2015-16 · St. Norbert
+244.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29598
Forward overall
#1216
Forward born in 1994
#1046
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mason Emoff
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Carson Jones
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryce Witman
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.150 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.