IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steven Phillips Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Neepawa Titans MJHL 42 9 2 11 0.262 0.0504 0.0491 0.1652 0.1609
2014-15 Neepawa Titans MJHL 58 22 16 38 0.655 0.1261 0.1163 0.4132 0.3810
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SR 31 7 11 18 0.581
2017-18 St. Norbert D3 NCHA JR 32 9 12 21 0.656
2016-17 St. Norbert D3 NCHA SO 29 9 10 19 0.655
2015-16 St. Norbert D3 NCHA FR 31 7 5 12 0.387
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2015-16 · St. Norbert
+406.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39892
Forward overall
#1597
Forward born in 1994
#900
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Klein
Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Kent
Hamilton · 2021-22
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Emoff
Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.312 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.