IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cody Adams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-09-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 53 1 7 8 0.151 0.0581 0.0636 0.2196 0.2404
2006-07 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 46 3 5 8 0.174 0.0670 0.0697 0.2531 0.2634
2007-08 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 60 4 20 24 0.400 0.1541 0.1521 0.5821 0.5745
2008-09 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 53 2 16 18 0.340 0.1308 0.1236 0.4942 0.4670
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Utica D3 UCHC — 25 0 4 4 0.160
2011-12 Utica D3 UCHC — 26 1 6 7 0.269
2010-11 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC — 29 3 3 6 0.207
2009-10 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC — 23 2 7 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2009-10 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+207.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14290
Defenseman overall
#1420
Defenseman born in 1988
#2426
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Orn
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.438 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Lee
St. Norbert · 2013-14
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Taje
Lake Forest · 2002-03
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.