← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Mitchell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 57 9 19 28 0.491 0.1647 0.1825 0.4552 0.5044
2018-19 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 46 15 20 35 0.761 0.2552 0.2704 0.7052 0.7473
2019-20 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 41 11 20 31 0.756 0.2536 0.2536 0.7008 0.7008
2020-21 Omaha Lancers USHL 53 6 20 26 0.491 0.2894 0.2894 1.4454 1.4454
2021-22 Omaha Lancers USHL 58 12 19 31 0.534 0.3153 0.2821 1.5747 1.4091
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 34 2 4 6 0.176
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 33 8 12 20 0.606
2023-24 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 13 0 1 1 0.077
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2022-23 · Nebraska Omaha
-69.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15427
Forward overall
#703
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2017-18
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2017-18
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.