← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Baldassarre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-10-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Williams Lake TimberWolves BCHL 33 6 4 10 0.303 0.1179 0.1292 0.4419 0.4842
2007-08 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 51 2 4 6 0.118 0.0458 0.0477 0.1715 0.1787
2008-09 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 52 5 4 9 0.173 0.0674 0.0674 0.2524 0.2523
2009-10 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 20 7 13 20 1.000 0.2794 0.2594 0.6901 0.6406
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 26 1 2 3 0.115
2012-13 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 11 1 1 2 0.182
2011-12 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 22 2 4 6 0.273
2010-11 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 23 2 6 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2010-11 · Westfield State
+122.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26179
Forward overall
#1026
Forward born in 1989

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2006-07
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia Wisconsin · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.