IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shawn Courtney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1988-09-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 38 1 12 13 0.342 0.0968 0.1014 0.2156 0.2259
2007-08 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 24 3 8 11 0.458 0.1297 0.1289 0.2888 0.2870
2008-09 Weyburn Red Wings SJHL 50 5 21 26 0.520 0.1502 0.1430 0.3915 0.3726
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 26 0 11 11 0.423
2011-12 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 23 0 5 5 0.217
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 26 2 7 9 0.346
2009-10 Adrian D3 — FR 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#12065
Defenseman overall
#1425
Defenseman born in 1988

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Riley Riddell
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2006-07
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Feeney
Trinity · 2015-16
0.710 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Mammas
Canton · 2017-18
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.