IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Bell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1988-09-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2007-08 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.1926 0.1895 0.7266 0.7150
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 27 10 17 27 1.000
2011-12 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 27 18 22 40 1.482
2010-11 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 27 9 14 23 0.852
2009-10 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 23 3 12 15 0.652
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.65
2009-10 · Castleton
+302.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Jake Wood
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
C.J. Reuschlein
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braedyn Aubin
Norwich · 2017-18
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Valenti
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Rose
Elmira · 2001-02
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.