IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Paul Davey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Brunswick NE-Prep 24 7 9 16 0.667 0.1881 0.1881 0.3051 0.3051
2019-20 Avon Old Farms NE-Prep 26 7 11 18 0.692 0.1953 0.1953 0.3168 0.3168
2020-21 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 41 9 9 18 0.439 0.2699 0.2699 1.2934 1.2934
2021-22 Des Moines Buccaneers USHL 51 8 10 18 0.353 0.2169 0.2141 1.0397 1.0261
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SR 9 1 0 1 0.111
2024-25 Boston College D1 HockeyEast JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Boston College D1 HockeyEast FR 8 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23947
Forward overall
#1315
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Canon Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carter Krenke
Saint John's · 2021-22
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Buster Larsson
Utica · 2017-18
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Headland
Canton · 2017-18
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.