← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Griebel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-03-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 54 2 5 7 0.130 0.0499 0.0531 0.1888 0.2010
2019-20 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 41 5 16 21 0.512 0.1974 0.1974 0.7463 0.7463
2020-21 Fargo Force USHL 53 4 13 17 0.321 0.1892 0.1892 0.9451 0.9451
2021-22 Fargo Force USHL 51 4 21 25 0.490 0.2892 0.2587 1.4442 1.2919
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Long Island Univ. D1 AHA SR 30 2 18 20 0.667
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast GR 25 1 4 5 0.200
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 19 2 4 6 0.316
2022-23 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 16 2 0 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2022-23 · Merrimack
-25.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4606
Defenseman overall
#1067
Defenseman born in 2001

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Cortland · 2013-14
1.320 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2010-11
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Becker · 2018-19
0.650 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.