IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Nill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-04-11 Country: Canada
2007 · Round 6, Pick #190  ·  St. Louis Blues St. Louis Blues
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Penticton Vees BCHL 53 5 6 11 0.207 0.0799 0.0810 0.3020 0.3063
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 39 2 4 6 0.154
2010-11 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 29 1 2 3 0.103
2009-10 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 26 2 7 9 0.346
2008-09 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 34 1 2 3 0.088
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2008-09 · Michigan State
+27.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#51786
Forward overall
#1747
Forward born in 1989
#2927
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Ryan McMurphy
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brad Hawkinson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Denver
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Muzyka
Skidmore · 2014-15
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Henry Molson
Colby · 2019-20
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Theo Hembre
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.