← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robbie Bailey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1989-03-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 46 5 4 9 0.196 0.0754 0.0763 0.2848 0.2883
2008-09 Quesnel Millionaires BCHL 45 11 13 24 0.533 0.2055 0.1994 0.7761 0.7531
2009-10 Powell River Kings BCHL 36 3 7 10 0.278 0.1070 0.0980 0.4043 0.3703
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA SR 19 6 3 9 0.474
2012-13 Marian D3 NCHA JR 26 5 6 11 0.423
2011-12 Marian D3 NCHA SO 26 4 7 11 0.423
2010-11 Marian D3 NCHA FR 22 3 4 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2010-11 · Marian
+168.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41337
Forward overall
#1371
Forward born in 1989
#2324
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2006-07
0.783 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2014-15
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.