IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Mazzarolo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-02-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Merritt Centennials BCHL 54 1 6 7 0.130 0.0499 0.0506 0.1883 0.1908
2009-10 Merritt Centennials BCHL 58 4 13 17 0.293 0.1129 0.1083 0.4259 0.4084
2010-11 — BCHL 37 1 5 6 0.162 0.0625 0.0570 0.2357 0.2149
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Neumann D3 MAC SR 27 2 5 7 0.259
2013-14 Neumann D3 MAC JR 12 0 3 3 0.250
2012-13 Neumann D3 MAC SO 17 0 1 1 0.059
2011-12 Neumann D3 MAC FR 18 0 2 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2011-12 · Neumann
+51.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21642
Defenseman overall
#1908
Defenseman born in 1990
#2983
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Pappalardo
Southern Maine · 2023-24
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Paul Michura
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Larkin
Framingham State · 2021-22
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.