← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex MacMillan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-03-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 6 0 0 0 0.000
2007-08 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 53 5 4 9 0.170 0.0570 0.0607 0.1571 0.1673
2008-09 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 18 4 5 9 0.500 0.1677 0.1716 0.4627 0.4734
2009-10 Merritt Centennials BCHL 43 11 12 23 0.535 0.2061 0.1991 0.7784 0.7519
2010-11 Calgary Mustangs AJHL 52 23 21 44 0.846 0.2838 0.2609 0.7831 0.7200
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 American International D1 AHA SR 36 15 20 35 0.972
2013-14 American International D1 AHA JR 35 12 17 29 0.829
2012-13 American International D1 AHA SO 31 8 5 13 0.419
2011-12 American International D1 AHA FR 16 1 1 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2011-12 · American International
-38.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28765
Forward overall
#1056
Forward born in 1990

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia · 2011-12
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2018-19
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2010-11
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.