← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max French Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-10-07 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Tölzer Löwen · DEL2

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 49 9 14 23 0.469 0.1749 0.1910 0.6840 0.7471
2010-11 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 56 12 22 34 0.607 0.2261 0.2364 0.8846 0.9248
2011-12 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 48 25 14 39 0.812 0.3027 0.2998 1.1839 1.1726
2012-13 West Kelowna Warriors BCHL 39 21 32 53 1.359 0.5062 0.4774 1.9802 1.8677
2019-20 Tölzer Löwen DEL2 46 26 27 53 1.152 0.4971 0.4971
2020-21 Tölzer Löwen DEL2 43 42 34 76 1.767 0.7625 0.7625
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Bentley D1 AHA SR 38 17 22 39 1.026
2015-16 Bentley D1 AHA JR 32 23 24 47 1.469
2014-15 Bentley D1 AHA SO 35 16 18 34 0.971
2013-14 Bentley D1 AHA FR 33 11 12 23 0.697
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2013-14 · Bentley
+100.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3657
Forward overall
#193
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.50 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2009-10
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.