IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Malenstyn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-05-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2009-10 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 60 9 8 17 0.283 0.0545 0.0510 0.1785 0.1671
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 24 6 5 11 0.458
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 29 2 15 17 0.586
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SO 25 1 6 7 0.280
2011-12 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC FR 28 1 6 7 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2011-12 · St. Scholastica
+419.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20952
Defenseman overall
#1874
Defenseman born in 1990

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grady Friedman
UMass Boston · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Wall
Trine · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Zander Latreille
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2024-25
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.