← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grady Friedman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-05-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 NMH NE-Prep 30 6 11 17 0.567 0.1142 0.1142 0.2594 0.2594
2019-20 NMH NE-Prep 25 9 9 18 0.720 0.1452 0.1452 0.3295 0.3295
2020-21 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 42 5 4 9 0.214 0.0796 0.0796 0.2269 0.2269
2021-22 NAHL 13 2 2 4 0.308 0.1142 0.1081 0.3258 0.3085
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Curry D3 CNE 20 6 2 8 0.400
2024-25 Curry D3 CNE 25 11 10 21 0.840
2022-23 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 25 5 3 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2022-23 · UMass Boston
+204.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34251
Forward overall
#1456
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2017-18
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2014-15
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.