| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Canmore Eagles | AJHL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2009-10 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 52 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.096 | 0.0374 | 0.0385 | 0.1403 | 0.1443 |
| 2010-11 | Salmon Arm Silverbacks | BCHL | 30 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 0.367 | 0.1427 | 0.1401 | 0.5348 | 0.5251 |
| 2011-12 | Canmore Eagles | AJHL | 60 | 7 | 23 | 30 | 0.500 | 0.1670 | 0.1555 | 0.4642 | 0.4323 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | SR | 27 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 0.556 |
| 2014-15 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | JR | 26 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0.462 |
| 2013-14 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | SO | 29 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 0.345 |
| 2012-13 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | FR | 28 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.286 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.