← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Krabben Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-06-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Canmore Eagles AJHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 52 1 4 5 0.096 0.0374 0.0385 0.1403 0.1443
2010-11 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 30 1 10 11 0.367 0.1427 0.1401 0.5348 0.5251
2011-12 Canmore Eagles AJHL 60 7 23 30 0.500 0.1670 0.1555 0.4642 0.4323
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 St. Scholastica D3 SR 27 7 8 15 0.556
2014-15 St. Scholastica D3 JR 26 4 8 12 0.462
2013-14 St. Scholastica D3 SO 29 3 7 10 0.345
2012-13 St. Scholastica D3 FR 28 2 6 8 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2012-13 · St. Scholastica
+102.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6805
Defenseman overall
#1047
Defenseman born in 1991
#1504
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2007-08
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2003-04
1.235 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.