IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jaden Schmeisser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2010-11 — BCHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0551 0.0583 0.2078 0.2200
2011-12 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 26 1 8 9 0.346 0.1334 0.1339 0.5035 0.5055
2012-13 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 44 3 9 12 0.273 0.1051 0.1005 0.3966 0.3794
2013-14 — BCHL 41 7 22 29 0.707 0.2725 0.2481 1.0287 0.9366
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Minnesota State D1 WCHA SO 28 1 3 4 0.143
2014-15 Minnesota State D1 WCHA FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#8207
Defenseman overall
#1079
Defenseman born in 1993
#1805
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Eric Bolden
Elmira · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Schmidling
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.