IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Berard Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-02-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 32 8 7 15 0.469 0.3635 0.3635 1.7448 1.7448
2021-22 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 47 4 6 10 0.213 0.1650 0.1599 0.7920 0.7675
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston College D1 HockeyEast SR 36 5 1 6 0.167
2024-25 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 35 4 1 5 0.143
2023-24 Providence D1 HockeyEast — 27 2 6 8 0.296
2022-23 Providence D1 HockeyEast — 34 1 2 3 0.088
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2022-23 · Providence
-35.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35609
Forward overall
#2186
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Jake Evans
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Joe Widmar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ UMass (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alex Talcott
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Michigan
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siroky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Miami (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Félix Caron
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ RPI (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brogan Shea
UMass Dartmouth · 2021-22
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Fox
Salem State · 2004-05
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
James Ring
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2010-11
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.