IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mike Sones Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-08-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Powell River Kings BCHL 54 8 11 19 0.352 0.1356 0.1406 0.5128 0.5316
2011-12 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 34 3 5 8 0.235 0.0907 0.0890 0.3429 0.3366
2012-13 — OJHL 54 12 9 21 0.389 0.0953 0.0883 0.2662 0.2465
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 UMass Dartmouth D3 — — 27 17 17 34 1.259
2016-17 UMass Dartmouth D3 — — 26 14 11 25 0.962
2015-16 UMass Dartmouth D3 — — 26 8 13 21 0.808
2013-14 Curry D3 CNE — 16 1 1 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2013-14 · Curry
+64.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#44153
Forward overall
#1664
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Terry Leabo
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Spethmann
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kellen Wasell
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.